So, let me get this straight. The ABC-hosted debate was unfair. Trump said it would be unfair. Fact-checking Trump was unfair. Not fact-checking Harris was unfair.
This sounds like a childish excuse for being trounced in a situation by circumstances Trump said he knew would happen. He acted like a nine-year-old who didn’t do his homework.
The key one is fact-checking. But first, a little history. In the debate with President Biden, Biden’s dismal and sad performance overshadowed anything Trump said.
I invite you to go back and listen to that debate. Ignore Bien’s performance and listen to the nonsense from Trump. If there was one truthful statement, it amounted to his being president from 2016 to 2020. Other than that, it was the usual lies and more lies about his economy, foreign policy, election denial, and overall performance.
The hosts of that debate, likely as stunned as the rest of the nation by Biden’s appearance, just let those lies hang out there.
ABC decided they would not do that. Trump knew, or he should have, if he is anywhere near as brilliant as he claims—a stable genius, I believe is his favorite saying—they would ponce on any lies.
Then why say things so easily debunked?
If Trump knew it was unfair. If he knew they would fact-check him. If he expected this, why fall into the trap?
His innate arrogance won’t let him accept someone might challenge anything he says.
And the two primary lies he told–that immigrants Harris invited into the country were eating pets and that the Democratic platform proposed by Harris includes abortions up to birth and even after birth (which any middle schooler would know is murder, not abortion, and not lawful anywhere in the country)—had to be addressed. Leaving them out there unchallenged was like accepting them as truthful.
Both statements are so outrageous they demand to be countered by facts.
To be fair, one could question Harris’s assertion that Trump is involved with Project 2025. The former President denies this. Yet he is personally named 310 times, and his administration is named 158 times. If Mr. Trump does not embrace the premise of Project 2025, why has he not demanded his name be removed from the project?
One could argue the hosts didn’t challenge the candidates enough when they didn’t answer the questions. Both candidates were guilty of that, and neither was challenged on it. But that is a different situation than stating an outright lie.
Vice President Harris waffled on some questions, using that to measure her suitability as a candidate is reasonable. Mr. Trump covered his waffling with outright false statements and contemptuous allegations targeting minority immigrant communities and inflaming the abortion issue with horrendous lies.
He deserved to be challenged on his false statements. The more significant issue is, if we’re measuring his qualifications for the Presidency, how could he be so easily tripped up in a situation he expected?
If he couldn’t handle what he knew was coming—according to his own words—how can he be trusted to handle the daily and infinitely more challenging and unforeseen circumstances a President faces sitting in the Oval Office?
Simply put, don’t lie. The truth is difficult to challenge. Or blame everyone but yourself for your disastrous performance.
Say what you like about Joe Biden; he recognized when he was over his depth. It’s too bad every candidate doesn’t abide by the commonsense philosophy, “to thine own self be true.”
There is a path to redemption. Agree to another debate. Make it on FOX News if you think that will make a difference.
I hope he does, but I doubt it. I suspect Mr. Trump cannot handle the fact a woman trounced him in a debate and another one called him on his lies. Maybe that really is the issue here.
Life, so they say, is but a game And they let it slip away Love, like the autumn sun Should be dyin', but it's only just begun
Like the twilight in the road up ahead They don't see just where we're goin' And all the secrets in the universe
Whisper in our ears And all the years Will come and go Take us up, always up
We may never pass this way again We may never pass this way again We may never pass this way again
We May Never Pass This Way (Again) Seals and Crofts
Fifty years since the Cumberland High School Class of 1974 graduated.
Fifty-years!
Many of us, while we may remember moments when high school was fun, almost to a person, couldn’t wait to leave. We wanted to grow up. We wanted to drive cars. We wanted to make our own decisions. We wanted to see the world.
Boy, were we foolish.
What's to come is still unsure: In delay there lies no plenty; Then come kiss me, sweet and twenty, Youth's a stuff will not endure. William Shakespeare, Twelfth Night
While nostalgia can whitewash memories, the intervening years have shown us how little we appreciated that brief time. In our desire to become “adults,” we let some of life’s most uncomplicated, most enjoyable times pass by.
Now, not every moment was a joy. Puberty is not a gentle transition. Entering CHS at fourteen years old in what was the brand-new Freshmen building, we had little notion of the transformation awaiting us.
Raging hormones are an insidious lot. But we survived.
Those first classes in the first week of high school seemed interminable. But we settled into a rhythm. Yet 1974 was so far in the future we thought it might never come. We didn’t experience time in months, seasons, or decades as we do when we age; we experienced it in seconds, minutes, and hours.
When we walked into the Freshmen Building in September 1970, the top song of the year was Paul Simon’s “Bridge Over Troubled Water.” A song quite appropriate for the time.
We had four years to go in a world on fire.
The war in Vietnam was raging. Over the next few years, a President would authorize a break-in leading to his resignation, we’d put more astronauts on the moon, and lived through an energy crisis.
In June 1974, the number one song was Barbara Streisand’s “The Way We Were.” Such a timeless classic still resonates today. Whenever I hear the song, it’s as if it was new. Memories do indeed light the corners of my mind.
The intervening years since graduation but a brief moment, the time between the beginning in September 1970 and June 1974 took forever.
Or so it seemed.
We were out in the real world in the blink of an eye. For some, this meant college. For others, it meant the parade fields and screaming drill instructors of the military or a job.
For some, high school was the peak. For others, it was the end of the beginning.
Some followed a well-established path, others took detours or hit dead ends. Most began to realize those four years weren’t all that bad.
Some made friendships that have lasted to this day. Others saw friends they thought of as lifelong move on, never to return.
Some of our classmates didn’t survive to graduate. Some only made it a few years after graduation. Too many will be gone soon enough. Life has no guarantees, yet somewhere among us is the last surviving member of this class.
Imagine!
The 1974 Class of Cumberland High School was the finest group of people ever to grace those halls.
Joe Broadmeadow
Some of our classmates walked out the door, never to look back. Some may not have let it go.
But we found ourselves no longer part of the group of people we’d spent those four years.
And now, this October 12th, those of us fortunate enough to go to our fiftieth-year reunion will gather and remember.
For many, there will be moments recalling the experiences; the teachers, the games, the concerts, the parties, the fake IDs, and the adventures our parents might have suspected but never found out about. Or maybe they chose not to know.
Whatever you recall from those years, good, bad, or indifferent, it was the most formative time of your life. The closest one could be to being an adult without the burdensome responsibilities.
Even if we didn’t realize it.
This may be the last moment you have to talk to your classmates. With a class our size, it may be the first and last time you speak.
Life is a series of comings and goings. In 1970, we all converged on Cumberland High School to begin a journey together. In 1974, we all left to start our own journeys. 2024 is a fitting moment to be together. We have the perspective of the intervening decades and (most) of the memories still intact.
The beauty of coming together these fifty years hence is reminding each other of that youthful innocence, if even for the briefest of moments.
And when you think about it, not much has really changed since then. Has it?
But there is also a duty here. A tradition to uphold. An obligation to preserve something bigger than oneself. There is one undeniable, irrefutable, immutable truth. The 1974 Class of Cumberland High School was the finest group of people ever to grace those halls.
Bar none. No one can ever deny that no matter how hard they try.
Let’s never forget it!
P.S. Just in case someone wants to make fun of my graduation photo, keep in mind I have the yearbook, the latest version of Photoshop AI, and an active imagination. And if you feel safe because you are not in the yearbook, I will find your picture.
I’ve written to you in the past in this form of an open letter. (Promise Me, Joe) and I am compelled to write once more.
The time has come for a new generation to rise to the occasion. You have said this yourself as I will remind you in this piece. Now is the time to put those words into actions.
Now is the time, Mr. President, now is the time.
To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, a time to reap that which is planted;
Pete Seeger, Turn, Turn, Turn! (or Ecclesiastes 3-1 if you prefer)
But first, let me say this.
Thank you. Thank you for restoring sensibilities in government. Thank you for rebuilding America’s standing in the world. Thank you for leading the world coalition supporting the Ukraine.
Thank you for leading the country out of the disaster of the pandemic. And thank you for putting an end to our presence in Afghanistan. Anyone who understands the reality of that commitment knows it was the right thing to do no matter how ugly it may have appeared.
Thank you for what you have done for this country. I only wish your opportunity had come sooner.
But there is what we want and what we have and that reality is what we deal with.
I heard you speak once after the release of your book, Promise Me, Dad. One thing you said, that brought to mind the Camelot of the Kennedy years, was it is time for a new generation to assume the mantle.
You were right.
Yet when circumstances arose, with no one stepping up, you did. Again.
You were there in our time of desperate need for a return to stability. And while the danger has not fully passed, time has.
Now is the moment for you to make your mark as one of our greatest Presidents. One who rose to the occasion as history demanded then recognized the limitations of that commitment.
Go out, find that new blood, and push them to meet destiny as you have.
Turn your words into more than a speech. Encourage this new generation, following your example, to set a new course with a new leader at the helm.
Don’t let the country merely vote against the disaster from our past, give them a choice with a limitless future.
Do this, and there is no doubt that future historians will mark this moment as another example of true American courage.
My fellow Americans, on January 6,2021 the nation’s capital was rocked by violence and rioting with many unlawfully entering the US Capitol building. This breech of security and violent action cannot, and will not, be tolerated.
I have directed the FBI and other federal law enforcement organizations to vigorously investigate and, if the evidence warrants, charge any individuals who violated the law. This attempted intervention into preventing the lawful and constitutional operation of government failed and will always fail under our democracy.
Vigorous debate is the hallmark of our system. It is our differences, our diversity, our unique American perspectives that drive our greatness. We can all disagree on the path forward, but we can never stop our forward progress.
If my words and actions over my demand for a careful review and revision of election laws gave anyone the impression I was encouraging taking the law into their own hands, you are mistaken. My intent was not to incite violence or opposition to the lawful transition of power but to insure the cause of improving the security of our elections, to guarantee the right of every legal voter to cast their vote, and to eliminate fraud.
To those who twisted my words into a call for violence, I urge you to step back from such actions and seek change within the laws of this great nation. We do not assault Police Officers, nor do we tolerate anyone who does. It is beneath the dignity of being American.
The cause for which we have worked these last four years, to make America Great Again, has accomplished much. Our country is stronger, our military well prepared, and our economy resilient. We have faced many challenges and will face more in the future. But we must do so within the law.
As I take leave of the Office of the President of the United States I pledge I will not abandon our cause. I will stand with all Americans and fight for the continued progress toward greatness. This is not the end of our quest, not the beginning of the end, it is the end of the beginning and we shall continue to work within the law to forge a great American future.
God bless you, protect our troops, and God bless America.
He could, but he won’t and the opportunity to do some good will be forever lost.
JEBWizard Publishing (www.jebwizardpublishing.com) is a hybrid publishing company focusing on new and emerging authors. We offer a full range of customized publishing services.
Everyone has a story to tell, let us help you share it with the world. We turn publishing dreams into a reality. For more information and manuscript submission guidelines contact us at info@jebwizardpublishing.com or 401-533-3988.
Signup here for our mailing list for information on all upcoming releases, book signings, and media appearances.
On 9/11/2001 America was attacked. 2,977 innocent American died as a result of this attack on American soil. The country rallied around the President, who rightfully called for an overwhelming response, and we went to war.
In February of this year, the first inkling of what would be the worst pandemic since the 1918 outbreak of the Spanish Flu began to take American lives. The President told us it would all go away in two weeks, or in a month, or by the summer, or soon.
Since that moment 311,000+ Americans have died.
On December 16, 2020, 3,611 Americans died of Covid, far exceeding the death toll of 9/11. And yet the country continues swirling in delusion over what to do. The President has moved on to a new delusion–ignoring the results of the election and claiming he single handedly developed the vaccine for a virus that was gonna fade away in the summer sun–and seething over his own inconvenient truth.
But the response, or lack thereof, to the pandemic is not all Mr. Trump’s fault. The sad fact of the matter is when it comes to reacting to problems whose solution lies in military action, blowing things up and killing people in other parts of the world, we are good at it. We’re good at it because the inconvenience of this action falls on just the shoulders of the military and their families.
But when it comes to tolerating inconvenience a little closer to home, we become a nation of whiners and criers. As a good friend of mine, Dr. Jane Auger, so aptly said,
“After 9/11 we started a war. Covid? Can’t even be bothered to wear a mask”
Dr. Jane Auger
311,000 Americans have died. Of that number, had we been willing to accept our obligation to protect ourselves and others, how many would be alive today?
Instead of our willingness to spend trillions of dollars on military capabilities, why is it we cannot be as quick to fund the means to support our economy while we practice the simple act of wearing a mask and avoiding public gatherings?
A nation that once bore the brunt of production of the materiel in a world war, that saw its people planting victory gardens and saving metal for the war effort, that saw the entire country rally behind a global cause, now is unwilling to forego happy hour or shopping at the mall because it is inconvenient.
There’s a line in the movie Patton, where George C. Scott portraying the general, exhorts his troops before battle. He says something to the effect,
“Thirty years from now when you’re sitting around your fireside with your grandson on your knee, and he asks you, “What did you do in the great World War II?” — you won’t have to say, “Well, I shoveled shit in Louisiana.”
George C. Scott as General George S. Patton
Years from now, when thinking of the Great Pandemic of 2020, many Americans may face the fact they shoveled shit in Louisiana…
The inconvenient truth is the death of many of these Americans falls on us. I hope, years from now, when you think back on those trinkets you had to have, those happy hours you couldn’t miss, those demands you made to exercise your “rights” to go to football games, you find it all worth it.
The families of who knows how many dead Americans the virus will ultimately claim won’t have that luxury.
JEBWizard Publishing (www.jebwizardpublishing.com) is a hybrid publishing company focusing on new and emerging authors. We offer a full range of customized publishing services.
Everyone has a story to tell, let us help you share it with the world. We turn publishing dreams into a reality. For more information and manuscript submission guidelines contact us at info@jebwizardpublishing.com or 401-533-3988.
Signup here for our mailing list for information on all upcoming releases, book signings, and media appearances.
"Great Grandad, were you alive with Donald Trump was President?" "Yes, I was, sweetheart, sadly, yes I was." "But how did America, the greatest country in the world, elect such a man? We've read about all the great people who've been President. And we've read of the ones who were not so great, but Mr. Trump was something else entirely. How was it such a man was elected?" "I wish I knew, sweetheart, I wish I knew."
Such is the conversation I might have with my long in the future great-grandchild. And I have no idea how I will answer that question. Yet, I know we have no one to blame but ourselves for the Trump era. Ours was the first time in American history where the older generation failed to instill a sense of duty and purpose and inspire a new generation to a call to serve the country, to get out and vote, to seek to participate in government rather than resigning themselves to the hopelessness of ever fostering change.
It left us with a broken system, ingrained ineptitude, and political leaders focused on being elected and re-elected rather than serving for the good of the country.
Perhaps it was because we continued to put the same tired old men (mostly) in Congress who sought only to preserve their positions, not serve the common good.
Perhaps it was because we let money, and those who controlled the overwhelming majority of it, dictate policies and fund those candidates who swore slavish fealty to those causes regardless of the cost to the country or the world.
Perhaps it was because we lost the art of compromise and conversation and replaced it with confrontation and contempt of anyone who disagreed with us.
Perhaps it was because we let a generation come of age where excellence was abhorrent and average was considered an accomplishment.
Perhaps it was because we rewarded mediocrity.
Perhaps it was because we were blinded by ignorance, bias, and uncertainty.
Perhaps it was our fear of the unfamiliar and the growing global nature of the world.
Perhaps it was our loss of purpose in pursuit of our own comfort.
Perhaps it was the inevitable decline that is a characteristic of nature.
Or perhaps, it was just a momentary retreat on an otherwise continuing rise to greatness.
Perhaps it serves to remind us of how easy it is to become complacent and fearful and jingoistic in our society.
Whatever the cause, our recovery is only just beginning. While I am pleased by what I see as a return to sanity and stability, Joe Biden is a placeholder and reminder from our past, he is not our future.
We need a new generation of leaders to rise to the occasion. A greater choice of committed Americans to occupy everything from the local School Board to Congress to the White House to ensure our continued progress to greatness.
I hope, if I live long enough to have that conversation, I can say this.
“Donald Trump was elected because Americans, many of them sincere and seeking change, saw an opportunity to send a message. That they chose the wrong messenger is something they had to resolve in their own hearts. Yet, despite the terrible risk and burden it brought upon the country, the silver lining from those days of dark clouds is we survived.
“And while I may not be able to explain how it happened, we can take heart in the way we weathered the storm.”
JEBWizard Publishing (www.jebwizardpublishing.com) is a hybrid publishing company focusing on new and emerging authors. We offer a full range of customized publishing services.
Everyone has a story to tell, let us help you share it with the world. We turn publishing dreams into a reality. For more information and manuscript submission guidelines contact us at info@jebwizardpublishing.com or 401-533-3988.
Signup here for our mailing list for information on all upcoming releases, book signings, and media appearances.
December 4, 2020, marks the 40th anniversary of the murder of Saxonburg, Pennsylvania Police Chief Gregory Adams. Shortly after the Chief’s brutal murder, police identified Donald Eugene Webb, a jewel thief and bank robber with ties to the local Patriarca Crime family, as a suspect.
Saxonburg, PA Police Chief Gregory Adams
At the crime scene, police found evidence linking Webb and his wife, Lillian, to the murder; a bloody driver’s license in the name of Albert Portas, Lillian’s long-dead first husband. They found other evidence suggesting Webb suffered severe injuries in the struggle.
Several days after the murder, police found Webb’s rental car, used during the crime, abandoned at the old Howard Johnson’s in Warwick. In the car, investigators found blood matching Webb’s type. But no one ever arrested or charged Webb.
According to the FBI, they couldn’t find him.
Despite having this evidence, the FBI did little to catch Webb. They set up a surveillance camera on the house—at first, on the wrong place—to watch Lillian. But other than that, did little else to suggest they were doing everything they could to catch a cop-killer.
Webb made it to the FBI’s Ten Most Wanted list (later joined by Whitey Bulger), where he remained for twenty-five years. Yet despite this high-profile designation as a fugitive, he wasn’t out of the country, or even out of New England. He was hiding in his own home, in Massachusetts, aided by his wife, using a hidden room in the basement. It was one of two locations where Webb and his wife lived while he was a fugitive.
Stanley Webb, a former New Bedford Police officer and Webb’s stepson, co-owned one house with his mother. He is now under indictment in Massachusetts on an unrelated 2018 gambling case linked to Organized Crime.
Other than the early attempts to gain Lillian’s cooperation—which failed—the FBI never tried to obtain a search warrant for Webb. The first time the FBI executed a search warrant at Webb’s home was in 2016, thirty-six years after the murder. They used much of the same information available to them decades earlier to justify the search.
The search yielded little results other than a hidden room used by Webb.
In 2017, investigators from the Massachusetts and Pennsylvania State Police, relying partly on information in the FBI search affidavit about the secret room and the Bureau’s contact with Lillian in 2016, executed a search warrant. They found Donald Eugene Webb, or at least his remains. Lillian Webb finally admitted her husband died in 1999 after suffering several strokes. She claimed she buried him, by herself, in the backyard when she was sixty-two years old. She then led investigators to the grave.
The search uncovered more than just Webb’s remains. Investigators also found more evidence related to the hidden room he used to hide out for almost nineteen years—the facts of this miscarriage of justice shock the conscience.
It took the FBI thirty-six years to get a search warrant to search a location intimately connected to Webb. It took thirty-seven years and the assistance of two State Police agencies to do what they should have done all those years ago.
The FBI told Chief Adams’s family they were doing everything in their power to catch his killer. It would seem they put his name on the most wanted list and forgot about it.
Then hoped everyone else would.
A strikingly familiar story about the FBI back in the 1970s and 1980s, echoing the saga of Whitey Bulger. For almost nineteen years after the murder, Donald Eugene Webb was alive and living in Dartmouth, MA. Yet the FBI never looked for him in the most likely place. They were grossly inept in ignoring the evidence, or they intentionally left a cop-killer on the street for reasons known only to them.
Why is it known only to them? Because the affidavit used to obtain the search warrant is sealed in a case over forty years old where the only known suspect is dead. The only indication of the existence of the search warrant is the reference to it in the affidavit used by the State Police in their search warrant.
It gives one pause.
But this is not the end of the story. In 2017, Chief Adams’s widow, now remarried, sued Lillian Webb and her son, Stanley, for the Police Chief’s wrongful death.
This case, given the revelations out of the Boston FBI office handling of Whitey Bulger, raises questions about why it took the FBI all those years to find a cop-killer. After the fatal struggle with Adams, Webb spent time in a hospital under an assumed name. Despite the evidence of Webb’s injuries, which common sense dictates would spark an inquiry at hospitals in New England—Webb’s home turf—investigators never found him.
Or they never looked.
Despite many reports of Webb being seen in New England, it took almost thirty-seven years for them to focus on Webb’s wife and son. After finding the remains, the FBI never filed charges of harboring a fugitive. Instead, the FBI sought immunity for Lillian’s cooperation, thus avoiding messy complications of disclosing the content of their investigation in discovery.
Was this another case of the FBI turning a blind eye to criminal activity in their single-minded pursuit of Organized Crime? Did the FBI let a cop-killer walk free in exchange for information on the mob?
Had you asked me these questions in 1980 when, as a young police officer on the East Providence Police Department, I learned of the cop-killer’s connection to Rhode Island, I would have thought you insane.
But now, knowing what transpired with the FBI and Bulger, it screams for the truth to come out.
Justice delayed is justice denied. Justice derailed by an agency such as the FBI is an injustice for which we should all demand a full accounting.
Time to untangle the troubling story of Donald Eugene Webb.
Captain (Ret.) Joe Broadmeadow East Providence Police Department
Lieutenant (Ret.) Tom Denniston Rhode Island State Police
Please share this and let the Chief’s family know we will never forget or rest until the truth comes out.
We are a country of law—not opinions, not perceptions, not beliefs, not accusations, but law. And it is under the law that this country survives.
No person, no institution, no office is above the law, nor do they get to determine of their own volition how the law may be applied. Congress enacts laws, the Executive branch enforces the laws, and the Judiciary interprets the law. Each of these elements must operate under the law.
No one individual can circumvent that for any purpose. We do not derail the peaceful transfer of power solely on the word of one man, not even if that man is a sitting President.
President Trump is on the brink of defying the people’s will by taking the law into his own hands. His purpose or rationalization is meaningless. His intent is unworthy of consideration. It is his actions that cause great concern.
He would have us abandon a two hundred and thirty year tradition of the peaceful transfer of power based on an allegation unsupported by any evidence, let alone a finding in a court of law.
By delaying the transition of power, he is violating the spirit of the law and the long history of this process. Once the individual states certify the vote, and the Electoral college casts the ballots giving Mr. Biden the total to become the next President, the law is clear. Mr. Trump’s continued refusal to abide by the spirit of the law will cross the line from obstinance to a criminal act .
I would remind those who support him that, not that long ago, many people and sitting members of Congress believed Mr. Trump guilty of impeachable offenses.
But the law determined he was not guilty, because the evidence did not support it. How one felt or what one thought about the decision doesn’t matter, it was made within the framework of the law. The same law we live by and need support.
Opinions, no matter how sincerely held, are meaningless under the law. Whether or not you supported the decision against impeachment is pointless. Whether you believe it was strictly political maneuvering that started the process and similar political maneuvering that ended it is meaningless.
The only thing that matters is the finding under the law.
Allegations of voter fraud are meaningless until a court decides under the law affirming such crimes. Until then, the presumption of any who may face charges is that they are innocent.
Thus, under our law, the integrity of the system remains trustworthy.
For Mr. Trump to recklessly and unlawfully obstruct the transition of power after the vote is certified because he “believes” there was widespread voter fraud is tantamount to a crime against the United States. A criminal act for which he, and anyone who actively takes part in this obstruction of the transition of power, should face charges.
Under our system, should this alleged widespread voter fraud be proven in court, Congress has remedies to address the issue. Until then, it is incumbent on all duly elected officials to support the peaceful transfer of power and to stand firm against a President seeking to subvert the system for his own benefit.
JEBWizard Publishing (www.jebwizardpublishing.com) is a hybrid publishing company focusing on new and emerging authors. We offer a full range of customized publishing services.
Everyone has a story to tell, let us help you share it with the world. We turn publishing dreams into a reality. For more information and manuscript submission guidelines contact us at info@jebwizardpublishing.com or 401-533-3988.
Signup here for our mailing list for information on all upcoming releases, book signings, and media appearances.
When one considers the risk/benefit of a free press and becomes concerned that a fully unrestricted press poses a danger to the safety and security of the country, I would suggest reading this article about the length some will go to get elected, and how a free press is critical to protecting America’s integrity.
When a Candidate Conspired With a Foreign Power to Win An Election
During the run-up to the 1968 election, Richard Nixon, in a foreshadowing of Watergate, did something in secret that is so horrendous as to defy credulity.
In what became known as the Chennault Affair—“named for Anna Chennault, the Republican doyenne and fundraiser who became Nixon’s back channel to the South Vietnamese government and lingered as a diplomatic and political whodunit for decades afterward.” (taken from the above article)—Nixon used this surrogate to persuade the South Vietnamese to delay reaching any agreement on ending the war on the promise that Nixon, if elected, would give them better terms.
This matter did not become public knowledge until 2007 with the release of previously restricted documents in Nixon’s Presidential Library.
Perhaps, if someone had the integrity and sense of honor to leak this information to the press, a quicker, less costly end to the war might have been achieved.
By 1967, the war had taken more than 20,000 American lives, wounded hundreds of thousands, and torn American society apart. But for the sake of winning an election—by preventing Johnson’s feverish efforts to negotiate an end to the war and extract American troops giving the Democrats a boost in their election prospects—Nixon sabotaged the negotiations.
The end result?
Six more years of war. More than 38000 additional combat deaths and hundred of thousands more wounded. American lives shattered, POWs languishing for five more years, and a country torn apart by anti-war violence.
This same President willing to sacrifice everything for the sake of an election victory would further sully the office with the Watergate scandal in securing another election.
Another episode which may have never come to light but for the sake of a deputy director of the FBI, a man of integrity known as Deep Throat, some enterprising reporters, and the Washington Post, a newspaper willing to fulfill its obligation as a free and independent press.
Sadly, at the cost of America’s most precious resource, the men and women willing to serve their country, this other Nixon episode never saw the light of day in time to do anything. Perhaps now it can serve as a reminder of the need to protect a free press.
Like the Pentagon Papers published by the New York Times detailing the American military consensus that the Vietnam war was unwinnable, which turned even more against the war by unveiling the truth, perhaps an exposé of Nixon’s treasonous behavior by an enterprising publisher might have saved thousands of American lives.
It is those drawn to the power of the Presidency that need bear the most scrutiny of a free press. Secrets sometimes save lives, more often they needlessly waste them.
That alone is a strong enough reason to ensure the preservation and sanctity of a free press.
JEBWizard Publishing (www.jebwizardpublishing.com) is a hybrid publishing company focusing on new and emerging authors. We offer a full range of customized publishing services.
Everyone has a story to tell, let us help you share it with the world. We turn publishing dreams into a reality. For more information and manuscript submission guidelines contact us at info@jebwizardpublishing.com or 401-533-3988.
Signup here for our mailing list for information on all upcoming releases, book signings, and media appearances.
Original intent is an issue often argued in matters regarding the Constitution. Usually it is in regards to the Second Amendment. But today we face a more serious challenge.
One that strikes at the very heart of our freedom; Governmental intrusion on Freedom of the Press and misunderstanding the faith of the founding fathers in the ability and obligation of the public to be trusted with the power of a free press.
What was their intent with Freedom of the Press and how does it apply in the world of instant, continuous news cycle and social media networks? Therein lies the brilliance of their genius, it still applies without any modification or caution.
One of the most powerful forces propelling the success of our form of capitalism is the free market. If there is a need, someone will fill it. When Congress, under the pretext of seeking fairness and impartiality in the press, deigns to intervene in what a media outlet publishes or withholds, it should give us all pause.
Congress often finds ways to intervene in matters best left to individual choices and when they do the results are almost always disastrous. In their attempt at forcing the hand of sites like Facebook, Twitter, and others on what they should publish or restrict, they are setting the groundwork for Big Brother control of the press and social media.
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, et.al., are not government agencies. They can, and should, be able to make their own determination on what they allow or deny on their sites. Let the market decide if it will support such policies, not the partisan, agenda-driven politics of ambitious members of Congress,
I wonder if Congress would be holding hearing on forcing social media to post recipes for bombs and manifestos calling for their use on the Capitol? Likewise, they have no business making any determination or inquiries absent clear violations of the law. And even then it is a matter for the FBI or local authorities.
That some media outlets lean one way or the other is irrelevant. Nor should the choices of what to publish or what to eliminate, except in the most extreme of circumstances, ever be the concern of the Government.
I think the founding fathers were clear in their intent that government has no place in regulating the press. We as a people value more an unrestricted press than any perceived harm such freedom may pose. Secrets are never more important than what they may seek to protect, no matter how well intentioned.
That one social media site chooses, for whatever reason, to restrict certain items from their site in no way prevents some other site from filling that need. Such questions are best left to the market demand.
But it does raise issues of credibility, verification of material, and trustworthiness of sources. In the matter of the Hunter Biden laptop, a prudent publisher might rightfully be concerned with spreading unverified allegations. And such decisions should be left to the publisher themselves and the demand of the market. Another site might see an obligation to present such material and let those who see it decide.
In either case, the government should have no say.
Once the government starts to determine what you must publish, it is a short jump to their telling you what you cannot publish. And therein lies great danger.
And to those who fail to see the danger in any government interference with freedom of the press, history offers a valuable lesson. Here’s a most applicable warning from someone who understood well the need to eliminate such freedom and went on to do so;
“It is the press, above all, which wages a positively fanatical and slanderous struggle, tearing down everything which can be regarded as a support of national independence, cultural elevation, and the economic independence of the nation.” ― Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
But this freedom of the press, like the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution, comes with responsibilities. Just like one cannot yell “FIRE” in a crowded theater, one must educate oneself to recognize the elements of truth or the veil of lies often hidden within published material.
Let’s take, for example, satire. That someone is so ignorant or blind as to fail to recognize satire does not render the publication of such material unlawful, nor should it trigger governmental intrusion.
Jonathan Swift, in his A Modest Proposal, suggested using the children of the poor as a source of food for the wealthy and income for the destitute as a satirical criticism of the wretched state of many of his fellow Irishmen. Just because some might fail to see the satire doesn’t justify government prohibiting it’s publication. Particularly when the criticism was directed at the government.
The founding fathers put absolute faith in the ability of the American people to recognize the truth from the lies. They believed literate Americans, who were almost exclusively white and male, could be trusted.
We’ve become more inclusive, a good thing, and better educated, also a good thing, but I wonder if we would instill the same confidence in the founding fathers. It would seem many, if not most, of our fellow Americans are blinded by confirmation bias, incapable of seeking a balanced perspective.
And that may well be our demise.
Once the government starts to determine what you must publish, it is a short jump to their telling you what you cannot publish. And therein lies great danger.
Author
The intent of the founding fathers cannot be expressed better than in their own words…
I am… for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the Constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents.
Thomas Jefferson
Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.
James Madison
As unbalanced parties of every description can never tolerate a free inquiry of any kind, when employed against themselves, the license, and even the most temperate freedom of the press, soon excite resentment and revenge.
John Adams
The freedom of the press should be inviolate.
John Quincy Adams
Where the press is free and every man able to read, all is safe.
Thomas Jefferson
This last quote by Jefferson is the most insightful, and illustrative, of all. When the founding fathers spoke of freedom of the press they were addressing its necessity to Americans who could understand, evaluate, and measure the words they read, and the importance of making sure all had the capabilities to do so.
While Jefferson, and many others of his generation, would have denied such literacy to blacks, both slave and free, and women, I believe, were they among us today, they would champion literacy for all. Jefferson and the others trusted the public to be deliberate in their reading and to separate the sensational and provocative falsehoods from the truth.
This required some level of education, some level beyond mere literacy, rising to the level of reason and intelligence. Such understanding arises only when one is able and willing to look at issues from all perspectives.
The courts have also recognized the primacy of a free and unfettered press.
Without a free press there can be no free society. That is axiomatic. However, freedom of the press is not an end in itself but a means to the end of a free society. The scope and nature of the constitutional guarantee of the freedom of the press are to be viewed and applied in that light.
Felix Frankfurter
Many distinguished lawyers also argue the necessity for protecting such freedoms from all attempts to silence or limit them.
We don’t have an Official Secrets Act in the United States, as other countries do. Under the First Amendment, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and freedom of association are more important than protecting secrets.
Alan Dershowitz
With this powerful history of support for a free and unencumbered press comes our responsibility to defend such freedom.
We should never accept, carte blanche, assertions in print, online, or in any other media format simply because they concord with our opinions or beliefs. It is incumbent on us all to recognize it is the diversity of our opinions and perspectives that make us great and to endeavor to understand opposing positions.
“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”
Evelyn Beatrice Hall in The Friends of Voltaire (often misattributed to Voltaire himself)
We should never sit idly by while Congress, for questionable partisan motivations, moves in any way, shape, or form to limit the media or insist on any control over the content thereof.
No one side has all the right answers and the only way to insure all perspectives are expressed is through a free press protected from any governmental intrusion.
JEBWizard Publishing (www.jebwizardpublishing.com) is a hybrid publishing company focusing on new and emerging authors. We offer a full range of customized publishing services.
Everyone has a story to tell, let us help you share it with the world. We turn publishing dreams into a reality. For more information and manuscript submission guidelines contact us at info@jebwizardpublishing.com or 401-533-3988.
Signup here for our mailing list for information on all upcoming releases, book signings, and media appearances.
The Writing of Joe Broadmeadow 