Here are two of Trump’s genius tweets I can agree with.
“Numerous states introducing Bible Literacy classes, giving students the option of studying the Bible. Starting to make a turn back? Great!”
And
“In the beautiful Midwest, windchill temperatures are reaching minus 60 degrees, the coldest ever recorded. In coming days, expected to get even colder. People can’t last outside even for minutes. What the hell is going on with Global Waming? Please come back fast, we need you!”
Both offer a perfect opportunity to apply sound scientific analysis to prove or disprove each of his points. We can scientifically analyze the science of Climate Change (part of which is global warming and part is significant alterations to weather patterns of increasing severity) and put the Bible to the same standard of validation and authentication as say, mathematics or biology. We should study both with equal intensity and rigid standard of review.
Who knows what we might learn about myths and misrepresentation of dangerous phenomenon
I would love to see more scientific and logical thinking. Sitting in the very wet midwest, Ohio, where less than50% of the corn is planted, I used to wonder what people would eat when global warming killed the crops. Now I wonder WHO wI’ll be able to eat fresh food….
Something will eat it, whether or not humans survive is the question