Throughout history, certain expressions arise from creativity and twist language into new and imaginative forms.
These expressions gain popularity, peak in their usage, then become almost too commonplace. Therein lies the problem.
I’d like to suggest two we should bury for the sake of intelligent conversation. The sound of these overused expressions tortures the senses.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, “awesome” meaning “inspiring reverential awe” goes back to 1598. The meaning of “overwhelming” goes to 1961, and the current weaker meaning of “great” dates from 1980. The term gradually lost its awesomeness over the years.
I say let’s finish it off and kill it. Wouldn’t that be like awesome?
Back in the day
There is no such thing. There is the past, perhaps worth remembering perhaps not, but it seems a poor way to give an example of something better. Upon closer examination, one would inevitably find the memory is clouded by the fog of nostalgia. It may have been different but it wasn’t necessarily better. Live in the moment to make these times memorable, don’t long for a whitewashed past.
We all have words and phrases we fall back on. When these expressions turn into crowdspeak, permeating every conversation, they need to be excised.
What are your most despised expressions?
9 thoughts on “Banning Banalities: Reclaiming the Language of Expression”
I use “awesome” and “wicked” all the time. Oh, and “cool.”
Then you are one of the perpetrators of this outrage! Awesome!
I am a high school substitute and would love to hear one sentence without the f-word.
I also use awesome,cool and great.I also use the words a lot, a lot.
Stop, it would be like a lot awesome
I hate when pundits and guest begin a sentence with “look” and “well I mean””