Mind Wanderings

Peace for Our Time, Give or Take Three Weeks

A white paper dove flying while breaking into pieces against a fiery explosion background

A retired cop’s note on the difference between calling a scene secure and actually securing it

Any cop who worked the road long enough learned to distrust quiet. A domestic goes silent, and the rookie relaxes. The veteran tightens up because quiet isn’t the same as over. Sometimes the yelling stops because somebody’s reloading. You don’t holster because the noise died down. You holster when the threat is gone, and those are not the same moments.

I thought about that watching the peace with Iran get announced, celebrated, and buried inside of a month.

On September 30, 1938, Neville Chamberlain stepped off a plane at Heston Aerodrome, held a piece of paper over his head, and told a relieved crowd he had secured “peace for our time.” He believed it. Most of Britain believed it. The paper carried Hitler’s signature. Eleven months later the Wehrmacht rolled into Poland, and the worst war in human history was on.

History has never let Chamberlain put that paper down. “Peace for our time” became the permanent shorthand for a very specific vanity—the vanity of mistaking a photo op for a resolution, of confusing the ceremony of peace with the fact of it.

Which brings us to Switzerland.

Give the recent version its due: it moved faster than Munich. Chamberlain got eleven months out of his paper. Barely three weeks ago there was a signing ceremony, a framework, and a memorandum of understanding. Sixty days to negotiate a real peace. The Strait of Hormuz reopened. The naval blockade lifted. Sanctions eased. The war that started on the last day of February—the one that chewed through more than ten thousand targets—was finally going to wind down. The paper was over the President’s head. Peace for our time.

The ink is barely dry, and the bombs are back.

As I write this, the United States has struck better than eighty targets across Iran—Chabahar, Kharg Island, the port cities strung along the Hormuz. Iran has answered by hitting American bases in Kuwait and Bahrain. Roughly six thousand merchant sailors are stranded in the Gulf, sitting on top of a shooting gallery. Oil jumped five percent the instant the President announced, at a NATO summit in Ankara, that the deal was “over.” He allowed that his negotiators could keep talking if they liked, but he wasn’t sure he saw the point. Talking to Iran, he said, was “a waste of time.” Better, he offered, to “just finish the job.”

That’s the tell. You don’t finish a job that peace already finished. “Let’s just finish the job” is not the language of a man who secured anything three weeks ago. It’s the language of a man who called the scene secure while it was still actively on fire, and is now irritated that the fire didn’t read the press release.

The supporting performance has been something to behold. In the span of a single day, the President described the leadership of a nation we had just signed a peace framework with as “scum,” “loco,” “cuckoo,” a “cancer,” and “evil, sick people.” He shared a photograph of billowing smoke he presented as a fresh strike; it turned out to be an image from the year before, and the original post quietly vanished once somebody checked. This is the peace. This is what it looks like now that the cameras have moved on.

Here is where the comparison gets unkind—and not to Chamberlain.

Chamberlain was wrong, catastrophically wrong, but he was wrong the way a man is wrong when he wants peace so badly he will believe a liar to get it. There is a tragedy in that. He came home clutching that paper because he genuinely could not bear the alternative, and history has punished him without mercy for the better part of a century.

The modern version isn’t tragic. It’s transactional. The paper went up for the applause and came down the moment the applause stopped. Nobody was fooled into peace. Peace was the prop. And the prop got struck the second the next scene called for a different set.

Twenty years carrying a badge taught me one durable thing about announcing that a situation is under control: the announcement controls nothing. The words “it’s over” have never once, in the entire history of human trouble, made it over. You can say them at a podium in Ankara or on a tarmac in 1938, and they carry exactly the same weight, which is none. The people downrange—the sailors in the Gulf, the civilians under those eighty strikes, the servicemembers on those bases in Kuwait—they don’t get to live inside the sentence. They live in whatever is actually falling out of the sky.

Chamberlain waved his paper because he wanted to believe the worst was behind him. That’s a human failing and a forgivable one, even as it damned him. So ask the harder question. What do we call it when a man waves the paper and never believed a word of it in the first place—when “peace for our time” was only ever “peace for our news cycle”?

We’re going to find out. Peace for our time, give or take three weeks.

The paper’s back down. The job, apparently, still needs finishing.

Maybe these are the right guys? Cannot be any worse.


Joe Broadmeadow is a retired captain of the East Providence Police Department and the author of the Josh Williams crime series. He writes on policing, politics, and the distance between what we’re told and what’s true at joebroadmeadowblog.com.

One response to “Peace for Our Time, Give or Take Three Weeks”

Leave a Reply

Discover more from The Writing of Joe Broadmeadow

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading